Experimenter Effects on Responses to Double-Entendre Words
- 1 December 1978
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Personality Assessment
- Vol. 42 (6) , 592-596
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4206_6
Abstract
The present study examines the possibility that experimenters may contribute to a subject's desire to defend against sexual expression by investigating the interaction between sex of experimenter and sex of subject on response to double-entendre words. The results indicated that subjects are more likely to provide nonsexual words when tested by an opposite-sex experimenter, although this effect is significant only for male subjects, and female experimenters, in general, elicit longer latencies to double-entendre words. These findings were discussed in terms of the dynamics operating within the type of experimental settings used to study human sexual behavior. Implications of these findings for personality assessment are also addressed.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ethical Requirements for Research on Human Sexual Behavior: From the Perspective of Participating SubjectsJournal of Social Issues, 1977
- Social Psychology and the Study of Sexual BehaviorPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1976
- Effects of guilt and approachability of examiner upon associative sexual responses.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976
- Experimenter effects on responses to explicitly sexual stimuliJournal of Research in Personality, 1975
- Effects of stimulus sexuality, order of presentation, and sex guilt on free associative latencies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974
- Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968
- Personality correlates of free-associative sex responses to double-entendre words.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968