Association of Communication Between Hospital-based Physicians and Primary Care Providers with Patient Outcomes
Open Access
- 20 December 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 24 (3) , 381-386
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0882-8
Abstract
Patients admitted to general medicine inpatient services are increasingly cared for by hospital-based physicians rather than their primary care providers (PCPs). This separation of hospital and ambulatory care may result in important care discontinuities after discharge. We sought to determine whether communication between hospital-based physicians and PCPs influences patient outcomes. We approached consecutive patients admitted to general medicine services at six US academic centers from July 2001 to June 2003. A random sample of the PCPs for consented patients was contacted 2 weeks after patient discharge and surveyed about communication with the hospital medical team. Responses were linked with the 30-day composite patient outcomes of mortality, hospital readmission, and emergency department (ED) visits obtained through follow-up telephone survey and National Death Index search. We used hierarchical multi-variable logistic regression to model whether communication with the patient’s PCP was associated with the 30-day composite outcome. A total of 1,772 PCPs for 2,336 patients were surveyed with 908 PCPs responses and complete patient follow-up available for 1,078 patients. The PCPs for 834 patients (77%) were aware that their patient had been admitted to the hospital. Of these, direct communication between PCPs and inpatient physicians took place for 194 patients (23%), and a discharge summary was available within 2 weeks of discharge for 347 patients (42%). Within 30 days of discharge, 233 (22%) patients died, were readmitted to the hospital, or visited an ED. In adjusted analyses, no relationship was seen between the composite outcome and direct physician communication (adjusted odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.56 – 1.34), the presence of a discharge summary (0.84, 95% CI 0.57–1.22), or PCP awareness of the index hospitalization (1.08, 95% CI 0.73–1.59). Analysis of communication between PCPs and inpatient medical teams revealed much room for improvement. Although communication during handoffs of care is important, we were not able to find a relationship between several aspects of communication and associated adverse clinical outcomes in this multi-center patient sample.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of Care by Hospitalists, General Internists, and Family PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care PhysiciansJAMA, 2007
- Adverse drug events occurring following hospital dischargeJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2005
- Trends in Postdischarge Mortality and ReadmissionsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2004
- Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmissionJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2002
- The Emerging Role of “Hospitalists” in the American Health Care SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Audit of workload in gynaecology: analysis of time trends from linked statisticsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Prospective Payment System and Impairment at DischargeJAMA, 1990
- Prospective payment system and impairment at discharge. The 'quicker-and-sicker' story revisitedJAMA, 1990
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987