Intrathecal treatment withσ1receptor antagonists reduces formalin‐induced phosphorylation of NMDA receptor subunit 1 and the second phase of formalin test in mice
Open Access
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 148 (4) , 490-498
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706764
Abstract
Although previous reports have suggested that the sigma 1 (σ1) receptor may be involved in pain sensation, its specific site of action has not been elucidated. The aim of present study was to determine the role of the spinalσ1receptor in formalin‐induced pain behavior, spinal cord Fos expression and phosphorylation ofN‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor subunit 1 (pNR1). Intrathecal (i.t.) pretreatment with the selectiveσ1receptor antagonist, BD‐1047 (N‐[2‐(3,4‐dichlorophenyl)ethyl]‐N‐methyl‐2‐(dimethylamino)ethylamine dihydrobromide) (10–100 nmol) dose dependently reduced formalin‐induced pain behaviors in second phase, but not first phase, of the formalin test. I.t. injection of BD‐1047 also reduced formalin‐evoked Fos expression and pNR1 at the protein kinase C‐dependent site, serine‐896 (Ser896) and the protein kinase A‐dependent site, serine‐897 (Ser897) in spinal dorsal horn. i.t. BMY‐14802 ((α‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐4‐(5‐fluoro‐2‐pyrimidinyl)‐1‐piperazinebutanol hydrochloride) (10–100 nmol,σ1receptor antagonist and 5‐HT1Areceptor agonist) dose dependently reduced formalin‐induced pain behaviors in both phases. However, the 5‐HT1Areceptor might not be involved in the antinociceptive effect of BMY‐14802 on the second phase, since i.t. pretreatment with the 5‐HT1Areceptor antagonist propranolol ((S)‐1‐isopropylamino‐3‐(1‐naphthyloxy)‐2‐propanol hydrochloride) (injected 10 min prior to i.t. BMY‐14802) partially blocked the effect of BMY‐14802 on the first phase of the formalin test but did not affect the inhibitory effect of BMY‐14802 on the second phase. In addition, i.t. BMY‐14802 significantly reduced formalin‐evoked Fos expression and pNR1 (Ser896 and Ser897) expression in spinal dorsal horn. The results of this study suggest that selective blockage of spinalσ1receptors can reduce pain behaviors, spinal cord Fos expression and pNR1 (Ser896 and Ser897) expression associated with the second phase of the formalin test. British Journal of Pharmacology(2006)148, 490–498. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706764Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Licking and C-Fos Expression in the Dorsal Horn of the Spinal Cord After the Formalin TestAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2006
- Sigma Receptor Antagonists Inhibit Human Lens Cell Growth and Induce PigmentationInvestigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, 2005
- Antinociceptive mechanisms associated with diluted bee venom acupuncture (apipuncture) in the rat formalin test: involvement of descending adrenergic and serotonergic pathwaysPharmacological Research, 2004
- ς1 Receptor Agonist-Mediated Regulation of N-Methyl-d-aspartate-Stimulated [3H]Dopamine Release Is Dependent upon Protein Kinase CThe Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 2003
- Cyclic AMP-dependent Protein Kinase and Protein Kinase C Phosphorylate N-Methyl-d-aspartate Receptors at Different SitesPublished by Elsevier ,1997
- Differential contribution of the two phases of the formalin test to the pattern of c- fos expression in the rat spinal cord: studies with remifentanil and lidocainePain, 1997
- Chronic treatments with aspirin or acetaminophen reduce both the development of polyarthritis and Fos-like immunoreactivity in rat lumbar spinal cordPain, 1994
- Cloned Glutamate ReceptorsAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 1994
- Molecular Characterization of NMDA and Metabotropic Glutamate ReceptorsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1993
- Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animalsPAIN®, 1983