Pluralist Epistemology and the Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm
- 1 May 1998
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organization
- Vol. 5 (2) , 233-256
- https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849852005
Abstract
Our focus is the differences between monist and pluralist epistemologies. We want to illustrate how the adoption of a pluralist epistemology can reshape our theorizing about firms, organizations and their management. We can then build theories that are inherently dynamic and treat firms and organizations as the processes of creating the values which markets distribute. But to do this we must move beyond today's positivist monist conventions to a kind of epistemological pluralism that some might describe as postmodern. Given this shift we can then address the kinds of dynamic non-equilibrium systems that are proving of increasing interest to social and economic systems theorists. Our conclusion is that useful knowledge-based theories of the firm are less theories of objective entities `out there' than sets of contextualized heuristics guiding managers' intervention in their organizations as quasi-autonomous systems.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organizational RenewalInternational Studies of Management & Organization, 1996
- Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theoryJournal of Organizational Change Management, 1996
- Competitive Advantage from Tacit Knowledge? Unpacking the Concept and Its Strategic ImplicationsPublished by SAGE Publications ,1996
- Scientific ManagementPublished by Springer Nature ,1996
- InstitutionsJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1991
- The New Institutionalism in Organizational AnalysisPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1991
- Communication networks in R & D LaboratoriesR&D Management, 1970
- Thought and language.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1962
- Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public ExpenditureThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1955
- A Comparison of Organisation TheoriesThe Review of Economic Studies, 1952