Splenorrhaphy for Splenic Trauma

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Thirty consecutive patients sustaining splenic injury from blunt abdominal trauma were evaluated as to the feasibility of performing splenorrhaphy rather than splenectomy. Twenty-four patients were over 14 years of age. The procedure to be performed was decided intraoperatively. Twelve patients required a splenectomy, and 18 patients had all or a portion of the injured spleen salvaged. The two groups were similar in age, mechanism of injury, and associated injuries. Nine of the 18 salvaged spleens required only debridement and the topical application of Avitene for hemostasis. The remaining nine patients required more extensive procedures including hemisplenectomy (three) and partial splenectomy (three); three patient patients required oversewing of bleeding splenic surfaces and the ligation of vessels without removal of splenic tissue. There were no differences in the number of blood transfusions required by the two groups. There were no postoperative complications resulting from the splenorrhaphy. Sixteen of the 18 who underwent splenorrhaphy were studied postoperatively by spleen scan. In all cases functioning splenic tissue was found consistent with the operative findings and procedure.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: