Accessibility Measures Compared in an Analysis of the Impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain
- 1 August 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Vol. 24 (8) , 1137-1154
- https://doi.org/10.1068/a241137
Abstract
A number of established methods exist for measuring levels of accessibility over space. Most notable are those based on market potential and access cost. This research is concerned with the comparison of these methods and the results that they produce in a particular empirical context. Accessibility costs for HGVs by road are measured for 1980s Britain with special reference to the M25 London Orbital Motorway. Specific calculations are made for accessibility which include and exclude the road and are dependent on an exogenously derived route minimisation procedure. These are assumed to represent the postroad and preroad situations, respectively. The findings point to significant differences in the results depending on the method chosen. This is contrary to previous research in the field.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Accessibility Analysis of the Impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on BritainRegional Studies, 1992
- The IssuesThe Geographical Journal, 1986
- The regional development effects of road investmentTransportation Planning and Technology, 1980
- Motorway investment, industrial transport costs, and sub-regional growth: A case study of the M62Regional Studies, 1974
- Spatial analysis of manufacturing growth in outer South-East England 1960–1967Regional Studies, 1972
- Spatial analysis of manufacturing growth in outer South-East England 1960–1967Regional Studies, 1971
- MARKET POTENTIAL AND POTENTIAL TRANSPORTATION COSTS: AN EVALUATION OF THE CONCEPTS AND THEIR SURFACE PATTERNS IN THE USSR*Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes, 1969
- SOME ASPECTS OF INDUSTRIAL LOCATION IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO *Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes, 1960
- How Accessibility Shapes Land UseJournal of the American Institute of Planners, 1959