The concept of vulnerability in disaster research
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Traumatic Stress
- Vol. 17 (5) , 395-402
- https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jots.0000048952.81894.f3
Abstract
The concept of vulnerability in research derives from a specific set of historical circumstances relating to abuses in biomedical research. Now so many people and groups have been labeled vulnerable that the concept has lost much of its force. In disaster research, participants should not be automatically considered vulnerable unless they are legally designated as such, for example, children. Instead specific aspects of the research should be thoroughly examined. Examples are the potential for the participants to be pressured to participate in several protocols, political or social turmoil surrounding the disaster, and cognitive impairments or mental health problems. In addition to a careful consent process, there should be procedures in place to provide assistance to participants who experience serious distress.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Special Scrutiny”: A Targeted Form of Research Protocol ReviewAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- The Vulnerable and the SusceptibleBioethics, 2003
- Bioethics, Vulnerability, and ProtectionBioethics, 2003
- Ethical Issues in Research Involving Victims of TerrorJournal of Urban Health, 2002
- Protecting Research Subjects — The Crisis at Johns HopkinsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Revisiting the concept of ‘vulnerability’Published by Elsevier ,2000
- Vulnerability: Reflection on Its Ethical Implications for the Protection of Participants in SAMHSA ProgramsEthics & Behavior, 1998
- Basic behavioral science research for mental health: Vulnerability and resilience.American Psychologist, 1996
- Hunger, famine and the space of vulnerabilityGeoJournal, 1993
- Ethics and Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1966