Higher Cumulative Revision Rate of Knee Arthroplasties in Younger Patients with Osteoarthritis
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 421 (421) , 162-168
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000127115.05754.ce
Abstract
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that younger patients treated for osteoarthritis and similar conditions using total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have a lower implant survival rate when compared with older patients. Previous studies have been done on a small number of patients and only included the younger patients. In many cases patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis have been included in the studies and exceptional survival rates have been reported. The current study compared the cumulative revision rate of the components in 33,251 patients older than 60 years and 2606 patients younger than 60 years treated with total knee arthroplasty or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis or similar conditions. Cox regression was used to compare the risk for revision between the two age groups and between gender and the effect of year of operation. The results showed a higher cumulative revision rate for the group of younger patients in all statistical analyses and the risk ratio for revision was significantly lower for the group of older patients. The risk for revision decreased for both groups when considering the year of surgery. This is probably attributable to better implant components and surgical techniques.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: An update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997Acta Orthopaedica, 2001
- Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients 40 Years of Age and Younger With OsteoarthritisClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2000
- Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompart-mental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative: 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prosthesesActa Orthopaedica, 1999
- Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients 55 Years Old or YoungerClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1998
- Unicompartmental or total knee replacement?The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1998
- Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Outcome in 1, 135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty studyActa Orthopaedica, 1998
- Total Knee Replacement in Young, Active Patients. Long-Term Follow-up and Functional Outcome*Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1997
- The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992Acta Orthopaedica, 1994
- The need for confidence intervals in the presentation of orthopaedic data.Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1993
- Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients Younger Than 55 YearsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1989