Identification of Device Malfunction in Patients Supported With the HeartMate XVE Left Ventricular Assist System
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- adult mechanical-circulatory-support
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Asaio Journal
- Vol. 53 (3) , 298-303
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mat.0b013e318033a6b0
Abstract
Predicting end-of-life for left ventricular assist devices is important to determine timing of device removal. A retrospective analysis was performed on 46 patients undergoing implantation of the latest HeartMate XVE from July 1, 2003, through March 31, 2006. Devices were assessed by analysis of motor current waveforms and quantification of the titanium or copper particles within dust localized to the driveline vent filter by optical, polarized light, scanning electron microscopy, and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. Assessments were performed monthly for patients supported ≥330 days or for unexpected device alarms. Thirty-one (67%) patients were supported for <330 days and 15 (33%) were supported for ≥330 days. No malfunctions occurred in patients supported <330 days. For patients supported ≥330 days, five had abnormal current waveforms or copper and titanium dust localized to the vent filter. One underwent urgent transplantation, three underwent device replacement (one death; two ongoing), and one is with ongoing support. Of the remaining 10 patients, seven underwent transplantation; two remain on device; and one died while on left ventricular assist device support. There were no unexpected device failures. Bearing wear of the HeartMate XVE is predictable by analysis of current waveforms or titanium and copper dust within the vent filter.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved Mechanical Reliability of the HeartMate XVE Left Ventricular Assist SystemThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2006
- Improved Durability of the HeartMate XVE Left Ventricular Assist Device Provides Safe Mechanical Support up to 1 Year But Is Associated With High Risk of Device Failure in the Second YearThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2006
- Major Factors in the Controversy of Pulsatile Versus Nonpulsatile Flow During Acute and Chronic Cardiac SupportAsaio Journal, 2005
- HeartMate® VE LVAS design enhancements and its impact on device reliability1European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2004
- Recent improvements in outcome with the novacor left ventricular assist deviceThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2003
- Novacor Left Ventricular Assist System Long-Term Performance: Comparison of Clinical Experience with Demonstrated In Vitro ReliabilityAsaio Journal, 2002
- Heartmate LVAD inflow valve dysfunctionThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2002
- Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2001
- Long-Term Use of a Left Ventricular Assist Device for End-Stage Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices Provide an Excellent Outpatient Bridge to Transplantation and RecoveryJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997