Measuring the importance of information in judgment: Individual differences in weighting ability and effort
- 30 April 1985
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Vol. 35 (2) , 156-178
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(85)90033-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability of actual and predicted judgments across timeOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1983
- Use of Individually Scaled Versus Normatively Scaled Predictor Cues in Policy-Capturing ResearchApplied Psychological Measurement, 1983
- Measuring the importance of cues in judgment for individuals: Subjective theories of IQ as a function of heredity and environmentJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1981
- Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977
- Intuitive Numerical PredictionThe American Journal of Psychology, 1976
- Use of consensus information in causal attributions as a function of temporal presentation and availability of direct information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976
- A comparison of seven methods for obtaining subjective descriptions of judgmental policyOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975
- Performance = Motivation × Ability: An integration-theoretical analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- Comments on the articles of Hodges and of Schonemann, Cafferty, and Rotton.Psychological Review, 1973