Unexpected yes- and no-answering behaviour in the discrete choice approach to elicit willingness to pay: a methodological comparison with payment cards.
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Health Economics and Management
- Vol. 3 (3) , 147-166
- https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025341318666
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Discrete-choice Willingness-to-pay Question Format in Health Economics:Medical Decision Making, 2000
- The natural history of diabetes-related complications: the UKPDS experienceDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 1999
- The contingent valuation method in health careHealth Policy, 1999
- Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.1998
- Economic Evaluation of Insulin Lispro versus Neutral (Regular) Insulin Therapy Using a Willingness-To-Pay ApproachPharmacoEconomics, 1998
- Willingness to pay for poison control centersJournal of Health Economics, 1997
- Does “process utility” exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomySocial Science & Medicine, 1997
- When Do the "Dollars" Make Sense?Medical Decision Making, 1996
- A Strategy for Collecting Pharmacoeconomic Data During Phase II/III Clinical TrialsPharmacoEconomics, 1996
- A multicentre study of the prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the United Kingdom hospital clinic populationDiabetologia, 1993