Patient selection determines the prostate cancer yield of dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging‐guided transrectal biopsies in a closed 3‐Tesla scanner
Open Access
- 8 October 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 101 (2) , 181-185
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.07219.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cancer yield of transrectal prostate biopsies in a 3‐T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and recent negative transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)‐guided prostate biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between July 2004 and November 2005, patients with at least one previous negative prostate biopsy within the previous 12 months had MRI‐guided biopsy of the prostate in a 3‐T MRI scanner. Patients with previous positive biopsies for cancer were excluded. Target selection was based on T2‐weighted imaging and dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE) imaging studies. RESULTS Thirteen patients were eligible; their median (range) age was 61 (47–74) years and PSA value 4.90 (1.3–12.3) ng/mL. Most patients had one previous negative biopsy (range 1–4). Four patients had a family history of prostate cancer. There were 37 distinct targets based on T2‐weighted imaging. Fifteen of 16 distinct DCE abnormalities were co‐localized with a target based on T2‐weighted imaging. Despite this correlation, only one of 13 patients had a directed biopsy positive for cancer. Including systematic biopsies, two of 13 patients had a biopsy positive for prostate cancer. One patient had prostate intraepithelial neoplasia and one had atypical glands in the specimen. CONCLUSION The prostate‐cancer yield of transrectal biopsies in a 3‐T MRI scanner, among patients with recent negative TRUS‐guided prostate biopsies, is similar to repeat systematic TRUS‐guided biopsy. DCE correlates with T2‐imaging but does not appear to improve prostate cancer yield in this population.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- COMPARISON OF ENDORECTAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY AND DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION IN THE PREOPERATIVE ANATOMICAL LOCALIZATION OF PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, 2005
- Negative Prostatic Biopsies in Patients with a High Risk of Prostate Cancer: Is the Combination of Endorectal MRI and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Imaging (MRSI) a Useful Tool? A Preliminary StudyEuropean Urology, 2005
- Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate‐specific antigen testing: 15‐year outcomeBJU International, 2005
- MR Imaging–guided Prostate Biopsy with a Closed MR Unit at 1.5 T: Initial ResultsRadiology, 2005
- ENDORECTAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND SPECTROSCOPY FOR THE DETECTION OF TUMOR FOCI IN MEN WITH PRIOR NEGATIVE TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND PROSTATE BIOPSYJournal of Urology, 2004
- Follow-Up of Men with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen and One Set of Benign Biopsies at Prostate Cancer ScreeningEuropean Urology, 2003
- Role of “saturation biopsy” in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic casesUrology, 2002
- PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS USING A SATURATION NEEDLE BIOPSY TECHNIQUE AFTER PREVIOUS NEGATIVE SEXTANT BIOPSIESJournal of Urology, 2001
- Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer: Correlation with Morphology and Tumour Stage, Histological Grade and PSAClinical Radiology, 2000
- Prevalence and Predictors of a Positive Repeat Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Needle Biopsy of the ProstateJournal of Urology, 1997