Chronic Care Clinics for Diabetes in Primary Care
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 24 (4) , 695-700
- https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.4.695
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To evaluate the impact of primary care group visits (chronic care clinics) on the process and outcome of care for diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—We evaluated the intervention in primary care practices randomized to intervention and control groups in a large-staff model health maintenance organization (HMO). Patients included diabetic patients ≥30 years of age in each participating primary care practice, selected at random from an automated diabetes registry. Primary care practices were randomized within clinics to either a chronic care clinic (intervention) group or a usual care (control) group. The intervention group conducted periodic one-half day chronic care clinics for groups of ∼8 diabetic patients in their respective doctor’s practice. Chronic care clinics consisted of standardized assessments; visits with the primary care physician, nurse, and clinical pharmacist; and a group education/peer support meeting. We collected self-report questionnaires from patients and data from administrative systems. The questionnaires were mailed, and telephoned interviews were conducted for nonrespondents, at baseline and at 12 and 24 months; we queried the process of care received, the satisfaction with care, and the health status of each patient. Serum cholesterol and HbA1c levels and health care use and cost data was collected from HMO administrative systems. RESULTS—In an intention-to-treat analysis at 24 months, the intervention group had received significantly more recommended preventive procedures and helpful patient education. Of five primary health status indicators examined, two (SF-36 general health and bed disability days) were significantly better in the intervention group. Compared with control patients, intervention patients had slightly more primary care visits, but significantly fewer specialty and emergency room visits. Among intervention participants, we found consistently positive associations between the number of chronic care clinics attended and a number of outcomes, including patient satisfaction and HbA1c levels. CONCLUSIONS—Periodic primary care sessions organized to meet the complex needs of diabetic patients improved the process of diabetes care and were associated with better outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- MANAGED CARE DATA AND PUBLIC HEALTH: The Experience of Group Health Cooperative of Puget SoundAnnual Review of Public Health, 1998
- Is the Quality of Diabetes Care Better in a Diabetes Clinic or in a General Medicine Clinic?Diabetes Care, 1997
- Attending the Diabetes Center Is Associated With Increased 5-Year Survival Probability of Diabetic Patients: The Verona Diabetes StudyDiabetes Care, 1996
- A Chronic Disease Score with Empirically Derived WeightsMedical Care, 1995
- Influences on control in diabetes mellitus: patient, doctor, practice, or delivery of care?BMJ, 1993
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986
- Randomised controlled trial of routine hospital clinic care versus routine general practice care for type II diabetics.BMJ, 1984
- The quality of diabetic care in a London health district.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1980
- The CES-D ScaleApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977
- Diabetic Clinics Today and Tomorrow: Mini-clinics in General PracticeBMJ, 1973