The Importance of Randomized Field Trials
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Crime & Delinquency
- Vol. 46 (2) , 156-180
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128700046002002
Abstract
This article lays out five standards for judging the importance of randomized field trials in estimating the relative effects of new programs and new variations on existing programs. These standards include contemporary evaluation policy, the historical development of trials in diverse sciences, ethics, normative practice, and the credibility of alternative approaches to estimating the effects of programs or variations. Empirical evidence and a line of reasoning bearing on each standard are made plain.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Political and Institutional Origins of a Randomized Controlled Trial on Elementary School Class Size: Tennessee's Project STAREducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1999
- Use of randomisation in the Medical Research Council's clinical trial of streptomycin in pulmonary tuberculosis in the 1940sBMJ, 1998
- Indicators of School Crime and Safety, 1998Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1998
- Published findings from the spouse assault replication program: A critical reviewJournal of Quantitative Criminology, 1995
- Answers and Questions About Class Size: A Statewide ExperimentAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1990
- Randomized experiments in the federal courtsNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1985
- Negotiated solutions to overcoming impediments in a law-related experimentNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1985
- The demonstration of state work/welfare initiativesNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1985
- Randomized Field Experiments for Program Planning, Development, and EvaluationEvaluation Quarterly, 1978
- Social experimentationSociety, 1975