Variceal bleeding: does variable delay in trial entry invalidate comparison between trials?
- 1 June 1987
- Vol. 28 (6) , 653-656
- https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.28.6.653
Abstract
Variation in time of patient admission to studies of prognosis after variceal haemorrhage has been proposed as a major factor in the wide range of reported results. A study of 144 unselected subjects with a low initial mortality (3% at two days) suggests that the effect has been overemphasized and studies in which time of entry is later than the date of bleeding may be usefully compared. Reanalysis of previous work suggests that even in populations with a high initial mortality limited comparisons between studies can still be usefully made. It is stressed that survival analysis must be started from the date of study entry and not from the date of the index bleed which involves incorporating a retrospective period of survivorship.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- RESULTS IN 100 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH STAPLED ESOPHAGEAL TRANSECTION FOR VARICES1985
- A Prospective Randomized Study of Two Sclerotherapy Techniques for Esophageal VaricesHepatology, 1983
- Role of percutaneous transhepatic obliteration of varices in the management of hemorrhage from gastroesophageal varicesGastroenterology, 1981
- The course of patients after variceal hemorrhageGastroenterology, 1981
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examplesBritish Journal of Cancer, 1977
- Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varicesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1973
- PROPHYLACTIC PORTACAVAL ANASTOMOSISMedicine, 1972