Transport of cholecystokinin‐octapeptide‐like immunoreactivity toward the gut in afferent vagal fibres in cat and dog.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
1. The distributions of gastrin‐ and cholecystokinin‐like immunoreactivities in the dog and cat vagus nerves have been studied after nerve section and ligation. 2. In dogs, there was an increase in cholecystokinin‐octapeptide‐like immunoreactive material on the cranial side of ligatures on the thoracic or cervical vagi. When pairs of ligatures were tied on the cervical vagi there was accumulation proximal, and a slight decrease distal to, the upper ligature. There was also a modest increase distal to the lower ligature. 3. In cats, section of the vagus above the nodose ganglion, and hence degeneration of the efferent fibres, did not prevent increases in cholecystokinin‐octapeptide‐like immunoreactivity on the cranial side of ligatures which were later tied below the ganglion. Removal of the superior cervical ganglion had no effect on the accumulation of immunoreactive material above the ligatures. Section of the vagus below the nodose ganglion, and hence degeneration of both afferent and efferent fibres, abolished the accumulation on the cranial side of ligatures which were later tied below the section. Cholecystokinin‐octapeptide‐like material is therefore localized to afferent fibres with cell bodies in the nodose ganglion. 4. Immunoreactive forms were characterized by gel filtration and ion exchange chromatography, and the use of region‐specific antisera. In all cats, and all but one dog, a molecule with the properties of sulphated cholecystokinin octapeptide was found to predominate. In some cats (30%) and dogs (26%) a molecule with the properties of heptadecapeptide gastrin (G17) was identified; concentrations of G17 were generally low compared with cholecystokinin octapeptide. In three dogs (20%) there was an accumulation of heptadecapeptide gastrin above the ligatures. 5. Axonal transport of cholecystokinin octapeptide in the vagus is consistent with a neuro‐regulatory role for this peptide. However, the functional significance of its localization in afferent fibres, and transport towards the periphery, remains to be determined.