A COMPARISON OF 3 MEANS OF PRESSURIZED AEROSOL INHALER USE
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 128 (2) , 253-255
- https://doi.org/10.1164/arrd.1983.128.2.253
Abstract
Bronchodilator response to 200 .mu.g of fenoterol hydrobromide, using 3 different methods of inhalation from a pressurized aerosol metered-dose inhaler, was studied in 13 asthmatic patients. On 4 separate days and in random order, patients received placebo aerosol or fenoterol aerosol delivered by the patients'' own technique, delivered under supervision by a trained member of the staff and delivered with a spacer device (Aerochamber) attached to the pressurized canister. There was no significant difference in the response to the 3 methods of active drug administration but there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) from the placebo control values. In this group of asthmatics the patients'' own method of inhalation, using the standard dose of 200 .mu.g of fenoterol from a pressurized aerosol metered-dose inhaler, appears to be as effective a means of bronchodilation as the other techniques.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of a new device for delivering aerosol drugs to asthmatic children.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1981
- An objective assessment of the tube spacer in patients unable to use a conventional pressurized aerosol efficientlyRespiratory Medicine, 1981
- DEPOSITION OF PRESSURIZED SUSPENSION AEROSOLS INHALED THROUGH EXTENSION DEVICESPublished by Elsevier ,1981
- The adequacy of inhalation of aerosol from canister nebulizersThe American Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Use of a special inhaler attachment in asthmatic children.Thorax, 1980
- SURVEY OF THE CLINICAL USE OF PRESSURIZED AEROSOL INHALERS1979
- Site of Beta-Adrenergic Receptors in the Respiratory TractChest, 1978
- NEW METHOD OF BECLOMETHASONE AEROSOL ADMINISTRATION TO CHILDREN UNDER 4 YEARS OF AGE1977