Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. IV: Should you be a typer or a grader? A comparative study of two histological prognostic features in operable breast carcinoma
- 1 September 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Histopathology
- Vol. 27 (3) , 219-226
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1995.tb00213.x
Abstract
In a study of 1529 patients with primary operable breast carcinoma we have assessed the effect of applying both histological grade and tumour type to determine their comparative value as prognostic factors in human breast cancer. The prognostic group the patient was placed in, based on histological type alone, was less accurate than using grade and type together for many tumours. The importance of performing histological grading of ductal/no special type carcinoma (50% of the women in this series) is confirmed in this series. The 10‐year‐survival varied from 76% for women with grade 1 carcinoma to 39% for those with grade 3 tumours. Some of the ‘special types’ of breast carcinoma including tubular, tubulo‐lobular, invasive cribriform and grade 1 mucinous carcinomas behaved as would be predicted, with a greater than 80% 10‐year‐survival in this series. Others, including grade 2 mucinous carcinomas, however, behaved less well with a 60% to 80% 10‐year‐survival. Indeed, many of the histological tumour types including tubular mixed, ductal/no special type, mixed ductal with special type and lobular carcinomas of classical, solid or mixed types showed a variation in behaviour that could not be predicted by typing alone. Histological grade and tumour type, when used together, more accurately predicted prognosis. In multivariate analysis of a larger group of 2658 cases of primary breast carcinomas (including the 1529 study cases) when histological grade, lymph node status and tumour size were entered, grade was the most important factor in predicting for survival. When histological type of carcinoma was included it was also found to be independently significant, although comparatively of less importance than grade. We conclude that tumours should be typed and graded in order to predict prognosis most accurately and to enable the choice of optimum treatment for women with primary breast carcinoma.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dna flow cytometry and pathologic grading as prognostic guides in axillary lymph node-negative breast cancerCancer, 1993
- The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1992
- Simplified method of grading primary carcinomas of the breast.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1992
- Histological Assessment of the Prognostic Factors in Female Breast CancerOncology, 1992
- pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long‐term follow‐upHistopathology, 1991
- Prognosis and Breast CancerThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1991
- Prognostic factors and long‐term survival in breast cancer in a defined urban populationAPMIS, 1990
- Inter- and intraobserver variability in the histopathological diagnosis of medullary carcinoma of the breast, and its prognostic implicationsBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1989
- Prognostic parameters in breast cancerPathology, 1989
- Long-term survivors after breast cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1985