Clinical evaluation of cardiovascular devices: principles, problems, and proposals for European regulatory reform: Report of a policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology
Open Access
- 14 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 32 (13) , 1673-1686
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr171
Abstract
The European Commission announced in 2008 that a fundamental revision of the medical device directives is being considered in order to clarify and strengthen the current legal framework. The system for testing and approving devices in Europe was established >20 years ago as a ‘New Approach’ to a previously little-regulated industry. It is recognized by many that the regulatory system has not kept pace with technological advances and changing patterns of medical practice. New legislation will be drafted during 2011, but medical experts have been little involved in this important process. This context makes it an opportune time for a professional association to advise from both clinical and academic perspectives about changes which should be made to improve the safety and efficacy of devices used in clinical practice and to develop more appropriate systems for their clinical evaluation and post-marketing surveillance. This report summarizes how medical devices are regulated and it reviews some serious clinical problems that have occurred with cardiovascular devices. Finally, it presents the main recommendations from a Policy Conference on the Clinical Evaluation of Cardiovascular Devices that was held at the European Heart House in January 2011.Keywords
This publication has 109 references indexed in Scilit:
- VARC consensus report: the FDA perspectiveEuropean Heart Journal, 2011
- Standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research ConsortiumEuropean Heart Journal, 2010
- Left to Their Own Devices: Breakdowns in United States Medical Device Premarket ReviewPLoS Medicine, 2010
- Health Insurers and Medical-Imaging Policy — A Work in ProgressNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Postmarket evaluation of breakthrough technologiesAmerican Heart Journal, 2008
- Assessment of left ventricular volumes using simplified 3-D echocardiography and computed tomography – a phantom and clinical studyCardiovascular Ultrasound, 2008
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategiesBMJ, 2008
- Who is Responsible for Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Medical Devices? The Role of Independent Technology AssessmentJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2007
- Multicenter experience with failed and recalled implantable cardioverter-defibrillator pulse generatorsHeart Rhythm, 2006
- Part I: identifying holes in the safety netAmerican Heart Journal, 2004