The Nevada Initiative: A Risk Communication Fiasco
- 1 October 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 13 (5) , 497-502
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00007.x
Abstract
The U.S. Congress has designated Yucca Mountain, Nevada as the only potential site to be studied for the nation's first high‐level nuclear waste repository. People in Nevada strongly oppose the program, managed by the U.S. Department of Energy. Survey research shows that the public believes there are great risks from a repository program, in contrast to a majority of scientists who feel the risks are acceptably small. Delays in the repository program resulting in part from public opposition in Nevada have concerned the nuclear power industry, which collects the fees for the federal repository program and believes it needs the repository as a final disposal facility for its high‐level nuclear wastes. To assist the repository program, the American Nuclear Energy Council (ANEC), an industry group, sponsored a massive advertising campaign in Nevada. The campaign attempted to assure people that the risks of a repository were small and that the repository studies should proceed. The campaign failed because its managers misunderstood the issues underlying the controversy, attempted a covert manipulation of public opinion that was revealed, and most importantly, lacked the public trust that was necessary to communicate credibly about the risks of a nuclear waste facility.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Institutional trust, information, and risk perceptions; Report of findings of the Las Vegas metropolitan area survey, June 29--July 1, 1992Published by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,1992
- Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear WasteScience, 1991
- What Should We Know About Making Risk Comparisons?1Risk Analysis, 1990
- Ethical Considerations in Risk Communication Practice and Research1Risk Analysis, 1990