Does it make sense to use two internal thoracic arteries?

This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:

• Similar hospital morbidity with the use of one or two internal thoracic arteries
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1994
• Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1992
• The return of clinically evident ischemia after coronary artery bypass grafting
  European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1991
• Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: Single versus double grafts
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
• Internal mammary artery: methods of use and their effect on survival after coronary bypass surgery
  European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1990
• Fifteen-year results of coronary artery bypass for isolated left anterior descending coronary artery disease
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
• Internal Mammary Artery versus Saphenous Vein Graft to the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery: Prospective Randomized Study with 10-Year Follow-up
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
• Influence of the Internal-Mammary-Artery Graft on 10-Year Survival and Other Cardiac Events
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1986
• Association between early graft patency and late outcome for patients undergoing artery bypass graft surgery.
  Circulation, 1984
• Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
  Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1958