The comet assay: Genotoxic damage or nuclear fragmentation?

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) or comet assay is based on the assumption that comet images result from genotoxic damage that ultimately generate DNA single‐ or double‐strand breaks. A criticism of the assay is that some or all of the comet images may be the result of apoptosis‐mediated nuclear fragmentation. The objective of this study was to determine if mutagen‐induced DNA damage leading to strand breakage observed in the SCGE assay was repairable or was due to nonrepairable nuclear fragmentation. Chinese hamster ovary cells were treated with ethylmethanesulfonate, 2‐acetoxyacetylaminofluorene, or H2O2. These mutagens induce genetic damage by different molecular mechanisms. One group of SCGE slides was prepared immediately after treatment, while parallel treated cultures were repeatedly washed and allowed to undergo liquid holding recovery for DNA repair. It was hypothesized that cells with genotoxic damage can repair their genomic DNA, while apoptotic cells cannot reverse nuclear fragmentation. We found a significant decrease in the tail moments of nuclei from mutagen‐treated cells after 4 hr of liquid holding. However, this measurement may represent only those cells capable of repair. Apoptotic cells may continue DNA fragmentation during the recovery time and this DNA may become so diffuse that the nuclei disappear after electrophoresis. To overcome this possible artifact, images of nuclei were captured before and after alkaline electrophoresis. Constellations of nuclei were located on SCGE slides by their coordinates on the microscope stage. We found that no nuclei were lost due to apoptotic nuclear fragmentation and DNA migration. Even the so‐called “hedgehog” comet images with extreme DNA damage were not lost during liquid holding. These data support the conclusion that mutagen‐induced DNA damage is the principal cause of the damage measured in the comet assay. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 42:61–67, 2003.

This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit: