Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Techniques and Instruction: When Does Evidence Justify Revision?
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 34 (6) , 780-784
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70105-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Checking for Breathing: Evaluation of the Diagnostic Capability of Emergency Medical Services Personnel, Physicians, Medical Students, and Medical LaypersonsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- Simple CPR: A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Video Self-Instructional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training in an African American Church CongregationAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1999
- Randomized, Controlled Trial of Video Self-Instruction Versus Traditional CPR TrainingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1998
- Checking the carotid pulse check: diagnostic accuracy of first responders in patients with and without a pulseResuscitation, 1996
- A reliable and valid method for evaluating cardiopulmonary resuscitation training outcomesResuscitation, 1996
- A peer-training model for instruction of basic cardiac life supportResuscitation, 1995
- O108 Do cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills among medical students meet current standards and patients' needs?Resuscitation, 1994
- O107 Basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills: A comparison of ambulance staff and medical students in GermanyResuscitation, 1994
- Education in adult basic life support training programsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- The problem of poor retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills may lie with the instructor, not the learner or the curriculumResuscitation, 1991