An Examination of the Construct Validity of the FIRO-B
- 1 October 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment
- Vol. 34 (5) , 419-425
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0091651x.1970.10380277
Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to examine the construct validity of FIRO-B, the principal measuring instrument in Schutz's (1966) theory of interpersonal behavior. Three separate components of construct validity (substantive, structural and external) as outlined by Loevinger (1957) were examined and evaluated. A total of 144 non-college adults represented three criterion groups (salesmen, policemen and service volunteers) for the three interpersonal need areas (inclusion, control and affection) measured by the FIRO-B. None of the expectations regarding the three components of validity were supported. The data suggest that FIRO-B is not a valid measure of the interpersonal needs as outlined in Schutz's (1966) theory of interpersonal behavior.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Client-counselor compatibility and the outcome of counseling.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969
- Ethnic identification and personality adjustments of Canadian adolescents of mixed English-French parentage.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 1969
- Operation KPE: Developing a New OrganizationThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968
- A Contribution toward the Validation of the FIRO-B QuestionnaireJournal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 1967
- Need and Value Shifts in College Training GroupsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1967
- Interpersonal orientations in clinical groups.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964
- Techniques of attitude scale construction.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1957
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1955
- Theory of mental tests.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1950