Mass allometry of the appendicular skeleton in terrestrial mammals
- 16 November 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Morphology
- Vol. 251 (2) , 195-209
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1083
Abstract
Most analyses on allometry of long bones in terrestrial mammals have focused on dimensional allometry, relating external bone measurements either to each other or to body mass. In this article, an analysis of long bone mass to body mass in 64 different species of mammals, spanning three orders of magnitude in body mass, is presented. As previously reported from analyses on total skeletal mass to body mass in terrestrial vertebrates, the masses of most appendicular bones scale with significant positive allometry. These include the pectoral and pelvic girdles, humerus, radius+ulna, and forelimb. Total hindlimb mass and the masses of individual hindlimb bones (femur, tibia, and metatarsus) scale isometrically. Metapodial mass correlates more poorly with body mass than the girdles or any of the long bones. Metapodial mass probably reflects locomotor behavior to a greater extent than do the long bones. Long bone mass in small mammals (50 kg) mammals, probably because of the proportionally shorter long bones of large mammals as a means of preserving resistance to bending forces at large body sizes. The positive allometric scaling of the skeleton in terrestrial animals has implications for the maximal size attainable, and it is possible that the largest sauropod dinosaurs approached this limit. J. Morphol. 251:195–209, 2002.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long bone scaling and limb posture in non-avian theropods: Evidence for differential allometryJournal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1999
- Phylogenetic relationships within the extant Mustelidae (Carnivora): appraisal of the cladistic status of the Simpsonian subfamiliesZoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1993
- The largest land mammal ever imaginedZoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1993
- Phylogenetic relationships of the fox‐like canids: mitochondrial DNA restriction fragment, site and cytochrome b sequence analysesJournal of Zoology, 1992
- The fossil record and estimating divergence times between lineages: Maximum divergene times and the importance of reliable phylogeniesJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1990
- Allozyme Divergence Within the CanidaeSystematic Zoology, 1987
- The size of the largest land animalJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1986
- Phylogenies and the Comparative MethodThe American Naturalist, 1985
- Elastic and/or geometric similarity in mammalian design?Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1983
- EVOLUTION OF HORNS IN UNGULATES: ECOLOGY AND PALEOECOLOGYBiological Reviews, 1982