How Control Groups Can Cause Loss of Control in Action Research: The Case of Rushton Coal Mine
- 1 December 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science
- Vol. 19 (4) , 409-425
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638301900402
Abstract
Experimenters who attempt to gain and maintain control over research situations routinely apply research designs using control groups. In this article, the authors examine the data produced by an action research project. Their findings indicate that the use of control groups can lead to incomplete and erroneous data and can even force termination of the experiment. The authors offer some suggestions for avoiding these difficulties and outline a new, more appropriate paradigm for research evaluation.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The human element: Its impact on the productivity of advanced batch manufacturing systemsJournal of Manufacturing Systems, 1982
- Quasiexperimental Research in Organizations: A Critique and Proposed TypologyHuman Relations, 1981
- Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: "Inquiry from the inside" and "Inquiry from the outside"Academy of Management Review, 1981
- Job Switching in Autonomous Work Groups: An Exploratory Study in a Pennsylvania Coal Mine.The Academy of Management Journal, 1980
- A PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE TO COMPARISON GROUP DESIGNS IN OD EVALUATIONS: THE ABBREVIATED TIME SERIES DESIGN.The Academy of Management Journal, 1978
- Opportunistic Organizational Research: The Role of Patch-up Designs.The Academy of Management Journal, 1975
- THE NEED FOR REPEATED MEASUREMENT DESIGNS IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH.The Academy of Management Journal, 1971
- Reforms as experiments.American Psychologist, 1969
- Some unintended consequences of rigorous research.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959