The clinically-integrated randomized trial: proposed novel method for conducting large trials at low cost
Open Access
- 5 March 2009
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 10 (1) , 14
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-14
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials provide the best method of determining which of two comparable treatments is preferable. Unfortunately, contemporary randomized trials have become increasingly expensive, complex and burdened by regulation, so much so that many trials are of doubtful feasibility. Here we present a proposal for a novel, streamlined approach to randomized trials: the "clinically-integrated randomized trial". The key aspect of our methodology is that the clinical experience of the patient and doctor is virtually indistinguishable whether or not the patient is randomized, primarily because outcome data are obtained from routine clinical data, or from short, web-based questionnaires. Integration of a randomized trial into routine clinical practice also implies that there should be an attempt to randomize every patient, a corollary of which is that eligibility criteria are minimized. The similar clinical experience of patients on- and off-study also entails that the marginal cost of putting an additional patient on trial is negligible. We propose examples of how the clinically-integrated randomized trial might be applied in four distinct areas of medicine: comparisons of surgical techniques, "me too" drugs, rare diseases and lifestyle interventions. Barriers to implementing clinically-integrated randomized trials are discussed. The proposed clinically-integrated randomized trial may allow us to enlarge dramatically the number of clinical questions that can be addressed by randomization.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Trials: The Art of EnrollmentSeminars in Oncology Nursing, 2008
- Sensible approaches for reducing clinical trial costsClinical Trials, 2008
- Long-Term Toxicity Monitoring via Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Receiving ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: a patient safety issue?Patient Safety in Surgery, 2007
- Participation in Surgical Oncology Clinical Trials: Gender-, Race/Ethnicity-, and Age-based DisparitiesAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2007
- Power and sample size simulations for Randomized Play-the-Winner rulesContemporary Clinical Trials, 2007
- Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: Eight‐year experienceJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2007
- The influence of bladder neck mucosal eversion and early urinary extravasation on patient outcome after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective controlled trialBJU International, 2005
- Reducing the costs of phase III cardiovascular clinical trialsAmerican Heart Journal, 2005
- The Costs of Conducting Clinical ResearchJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003