Abstract
Strategies proposed for non-cooperative dynamic games representing economic competition have been suboptimal and dynamically inconsistent because they ignore the implicit non-causality facing each player. This paper specifies and evaluates the optimal equilibrium strategies for an unrestrictedly competitive game. The results are compared to the dynamic Staekelberg and Cournot strategies. The suboptimality in ignoring non-causality may exceed that in ignoring the game altogether : and it will systematically overstate the gains to possible cooperative decisions

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit: