Market essentialism and the impermissibility of unfree labour: A reply to Shlomowitz
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Slavery & Abolition
- Vol. 12 (3) , 225-244
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01440399108575044
Abstract
(1991). Market essentialism and the impermissibility of unfree labour: A reply to Shlomowitz. Slavery & Abolition: Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 225-244.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Moral economists, subalterns, new social movements, and the (re‐) emergence of a (post‐) modernized (middle) peasantThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1991
- Mortality and migrant labour en route to Assam, 1863-1924The Indian Economic & Social History Review, 1990
- The Latin Americanenganchesystem: Some revisionist reinterpretations revisitedSlavery & Abolition, 1990
- Peasant essentialism and the Agrarian question in the Colombian AndesThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1990
- Trotskyism, Hugo Blanco and the ideology of a Peruvian peasant movementThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 1989
- Free and Unfree Rural Labour in Puerto Rico during the Nineteenth CenturyJournal of Latin American Studies, 1986
- On Comparative History: A Reply to Tom BrassJournal of Latin American Studies, 1984
- Coffee and Rural Proletarianization: A Comment on BergadJournal of Latin American Studies, 1984
- TRUCK AND GIFTS: MELANESIAN IMMIGRANTS AND THE TRADE BOX SYSTEM IN COLONIAL QUEENSLANDPast & Present, 1983
- Coffee and Rural Proletarianization in Puerto Rico, 1840–1898Journal of Latin American Studies, 1983