Quantifying the Scanty Science of Prehospital Emergency Care
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 30 (6) , 785-790
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70049-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing a Foundation for the Evaluation of Expanded-Scope EMS: A Window of Opportunity That Cannot Be IgnoredAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Multiple Options and Unique Pathways: A New Direction for EMS?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1997
- Subverting Randomization in Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1995
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- Manually recorded timeAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- Positive‐outcome Bias: Comparison of Emergency Medicine and General Medicine LiteraturesAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1994
- Does anybody really know what time it is? Does anybody really care?Annals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: MedicalStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- Bias in Treatment Assignment in Controlled Clinical TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Sensitivity and Specificity of Clinical TrialsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1983