Compositional and thermal characterization of genuine and randomized lard: A comparative study
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Oil & Fat Industries
- Vol. 73 (3) , 303-309
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02523423
Abstract
Composition and thermal characterization of genuine and randomized lard were investigated comparatively in an attempt to find common merits that assess lard detection. The investigation included compositional and positional distribution of fatty acids, triacylglycerol profiling by gas chromatography (GC) and reversed‐phase high‐performance liquid chromatography (RP‐HPLC), as well as thermal behavior by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of both samples. Individual and total saturated and unsaturated fatty acid composition in total fats of both genuine and randomized lard were identical. On the other hand, the results of pancreatic lipolysis/GC analysis showed that the average percent palmitic acid [PAEF(%)] and myristic acid [MAEF(%)] enrichment factors of genuine (280 and 270) and randomized lard (110 and 98) were quite different. Thus, application of PAEF to detect randomized lard is of no value. However, normalization of fatty acid distribution by randomization in 2‐monoacylglycerols made the individual and total saturated and unsaturated fatty acids almost identical to that of total fat and neutral triacylglycerols (TG) of lard. TG compositional analysis by GC revealed that both genuine and randomized lard had six dominant TG (C46′C48′C50′C52′C54′ and C56) with quite different concentrations. TG with C52 represent the major constituent of genuine and randomized lard. TG profiling of samples was also carried out by RP‐HPLC with a refractive index detector. The same peaks were eluted in both samples, but the area % of major peaks changed due to randomization. 2‐Palmitooleostearin (SPO) was found in high proportion in lard. However, the ratios of SPO to 2‐palmitooleolinolein of both genuine and randomized lard are close (0.6±0.05) and significantly distinguishable from that of beef (4.24), mutton (6.17), chicken (0.21), and turkey (0.14) fats. The DSC thermogram and thermodynamics of phase transitions of both samples were quite different and do not reveal common characteristic(s) that could be used for immediate detection of lard substances in fat admixtures.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Triacylglycerols-Profiling by High Performance Liquid Chromatography: A Tool for Detection of Pork Fat (Lard) in Processed FoodsJournal of Liquid Chromatography, 1995
- Influence of dietary fat quantity and composition on insulin binding to rat intestine.Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 1993
- Effects of high fat diet and cholecystokinin receptor blockade on pancreatic growth and tumor initiation in the hamsterCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1993
- Dairy fat, saturated animal fat, and cancer riskPreventive Medicine, 1991
- Sub‐ambient differential scanning calorimetry of lard and lard contaminated by tallowInternational Journal of Food Science & Technology, 1989
- Dietary fat and colon cancer: Animal modelsPreventive Medicine, 1987
- Differential scanning calorimetry in food research—A reviewFood Chemistry, 1983
- Dietary cholesterol and experimental mammary cancer developmentNutrition and Cancer, 1982
- A study of palmitic-stearic triglycerides and their binary mixtures by differential thermal analysis (DTA) - I - pure triglyceridesChemistry and Physics of Lipids, 1969