Interpretation by Physicians of Clinical Laboratory Results
- 2 November 1978
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 299 (18) , 999-1001
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm197811022991808
Abstract
AS both the number and cost of clinical laboratory tests continue to increase at an accelerating rate,1 physicians are faced with the task of comprehending and acting on a rising flood tide of information. We conducted a small survey to obtain some idea of how physicians do, in fact, interpret a laboratory result.MethodsWe asked 20 house officers, 20 fourth-year medical students and 20 attending physicians, selected in 67 consecutive hallway encounters at four Harvard Medical School teaching hospitals, the following question: "If a test to detect a disease whose prevalence is 1/1000 has a false positive rate of . . .Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation among Physicians in Use of Laboratory Tests II. Relation to Clinical Productivity and Outcomes of CareMedical Care, 1977
- CLINICAL LABORATORIESSouthern Medical Journal, 1976
- Primer on Certain Elements of Medical Decision MakingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- A Probability Graph Describing the Predictive Value of a Highly Sensitive Diagnostic TestNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974
- Decision analysis and clinical judgmentThe American Journal of Medicine, 1973
- Biochemical Screening — A CritiqueNew England Journal of Medicine, 1970
- Judgment Based on 95% Confidence Limits: A Statistical Dilemma Involving Multitest Screening and Proficiency Testing of Multiple SpecimensAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1970
- Health, normality, and the ghost of GaussPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1970
- Predictive Value of a Single Diagnostic Test in Unselected PopulationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1966
- THE CONCEPT OF ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSIONAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1955