Preoperative Lymphoscintigraphy for Breast Cancer Does Not Improve the Ability to Identify Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 231 (5) , 724-731
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200005000-00013
Abstract
To evaluate the role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for breast cancer. Numerous studies have demonstrated that SLN biopsy can be used to stage axillary lymph nodes for breast cancer. SLN biopsy is performed using injection of radioactive colloid, blue dye, or both. When radioactive colloid is used, a preoperative lymphoscintigram (nuclear medicine scan) is often obtained to ease SLN identification. Whether a preoperative lymphoscintigram adds diagnostic accuracy to offset the additional time and cost required is not clear. After informed consent was obtained, 805 patients were enrolled in the University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study, a multiinstitutional study involving 99 surgeons. Patients with clinical stage T1–2, N0 breast cancer were eligible for the study. All patients underwent SLN biopsy, followed by level I/II axillary dissection. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed at the discretion of the individual surgeon. Biopsy of nonaxillary SLNs was not required in the protocol. Chi-square analysis and analysis of variance were used for statistical comparison. Radioactive colloid injection was performed in 588 patients. In 560, peritumoral injection of isosulfan blue dye was also performed. A preoperative lymphoscintigram was obtained in 348 of the 588 patients (59%). The SLN was identified in 221 of 240 patients (92.1%) who did not undergo a preoperative lymphoscintigram, with a false-negative rate of 1.6%. In the 348 patients who underwent a preoperative lymphoscintigram, the SLN was identified in 310 (89.1%), with a false-negative rate of 8.7%. A mean of 2.2 and 2.0 SLNs per patient were removed in the groups without and with a preoperative lymphoscintigram, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the SLN identification rate, false-negative rate, or number of SLNs removed when a preoperative lymphoscintigram was obtained. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy does not improve the ability to identify axillary SLN during surgery, nor does it decrease the false-negative rate. Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary for the identification of axillary SLNs in breast cancer.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Location of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cutaneous melanoma: new insights into lymphatic anatomyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1999
- Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancerThe American Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: unfiltered radioisotope is superior to filtered11No competing interests declared.Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 1999
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer: Results in a Large SeriesJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Sentinel-Lymph-Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer — Not Yet the Standard of CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- The Sentinel Node in Breast Cancer — A Multicenter Validation StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer: Guidelines and Pitfalls of Lymphoscintigraphy and Gamma Probe DetectionJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1998
- Early stage melanoma: lymphoscintigraphy, reproducibility of sentinel node detection, and effectiveness of the intraoperative gamma probe.Radiology, 1996
- Intraoperative Radiolymphoscintigraphy Improves Sentinel Lymph Node Identification for Patients with MelanomaAnnals of Surgery, 1996
- Minimal-Access Surgery for Staging of Malignant MelanomaArchives of Surgery, 1995