Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and Chlamydiazyme for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 11 (3) , 233-236
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02098085
Abstract
An attempt was made to improve laboratory diagnosis ofChalmydia trachomatis and to validate the Abbott Chlamydiazyme confirmatory test used at present by comparing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure and the Abbott enzyme immunoassay. A total of 275 routine clinical specimens representing a range of positive and negative findings by Chlamydiazyme were retested by PCR. The procedures demonstrated 99 % concordance for specimens with optical density (OD) readings above the Chlamydiazyme cut-off of 0.1, but PCR was confirmed to be significantly more sensitive (p<0.025) for specimens with OD values between 0.05 and 0.09. Specimens in this range should be retested routinely by PCR.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Detection and Differentiation of Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia psittaci, and Chlamydia pneumoniae by DNA AmplificationThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1990
- HLA DNA TYPINGPublished by Elsevier ,1990
- A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol for the specific detection of Chlamydia sppMolecular and Cellular Probes, 1989
- Avoiding false positives with PCRNature, 1989
- Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reactionResearch in Microbiology, 1989
- Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a pregnancy counseling clinicAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- A potent inhibitor ofTaqpolymerase copurifies with human genomic DNANucleic Acids Research, 1988