State Executions, Deterrence, and the Incidence of Murder
Open Access
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Applied Economics
- Vol. 7 (1) , 163-193
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2004.12040607
Abstract
This study employs a panel of U.S. state-level data over the years 1978–1997 to estimate the deterrent effect of capital punishment. Particular attention is paid to problems of endogeneity bias arising from the non-random assignment of death penalty laws across states and a simultaneous relationship between murders and the deterrence probabilities. The primary innovation of the analysis lies in the estimation of a simultaneous equations system whose identification is based upon the employment of instrumental variables motivated by the theory of public choice. The estimation results suggest that structural estimates of the deterrent effect of capital punishment are likely to be downward biased due to the influence of simultaneity. Correcting for simultaneity, the estimates imply that a state execution deters approximately fourteen murders per year on average. Finally, the results also suggest that the announcement effect of capital punishment, as opposed to the existence of a death penalty provision, is the mechanism actually driving the deterrent effect associated with state executions.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Capital Punishment Have a Deterrent Effect? New Evidence from Postmoratorium Panel DataAmerican Law and Economics Review, 2003
- Prison Conditions, Capital Punishment, and DeterrenceAmerican Law and Economics Review, 2003
- Does the Right to Carry Concealed Handguns Deter Countable Crimes? Only a Count Analysis Can SayThe Journal of Law and Economics, 2001
- The Lethal Effects of Three‐Strikes LawsThe Journal of Legal Studies, 2001
- Deterrence and Public Policy: Trade-Offs in the Allocation of Police ResourcesInternational Review of Law and Economics, 1998
- CRIMINAL DETERRENCE IN THE REDUCED FORM: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON EHRLICH'S SEMINAL STUDYEconomic Inquiry, 1995
- Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation when the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is WeakJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Estimating Deterrence Effects: A Public Choice Perspective on the Economics of Crime LiteratureSouthern Economic Journal, 1994
- The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: An Analysis of Daily Homicide CountsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1990
- Recent Econometric Modeling of Crime and PunishmentEvaluation Review, 1980