Which strategy is “best” after myocardial infarction? the beta-blocker strategy plus implantable cardioverter defibrillator trial: rationale and study design
- 11 March 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 83 (5) , 104-111
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(98)01040-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Antiarrhythmic Drugs Survive Survival Trials?The American Journal of Cardiology, 1998
- Dofetilide in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and either heart failure or acute myocardial infarction: Rationale, design, and patient characteristics of the DIAMOND studiesClinical Cardiology, 1997
- The Effect of Carvedilol on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Prediction of late arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction from combined use of noninvasive prognostic variables and inducibility of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- Preliminary Report: Effect of Encainide and Flecainide on Mortality in a Randomized Trial of Arrhythmia Suppression after Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trialsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1985
- The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1984
- Timolol-Induced Reduction in Mortality and Reinfarction in Patients Surviving Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- QT interval prolongation as predictor of sudden death in patients with myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1978