Gene profiling in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
- Vol. 24 (1) , 87-94
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-005-5049-z
Abstract
Survival for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is still poor, despite great technical improvements in radiotherapy and surgery. A possible explanation for this is the lack of individualization in treatment based on biological properties of the tumors, resulting in over- as well as under treatment. Management of SCCHN has mainly been based on TNM classification over the last decades. However, a large amount of studies have shown that biomarkers may add prognostic information, independently of the TNM system, indicating that biological aggressiveness is not entirely reflected by the T- and N-status of the tumor. A conclusion to draw from this is that the present standardized treatment based on macroscopic features of the tumor in many cases will result in suboptimal treatment since important underlaying genetic properties of the tumors are not taken into consideration. A variety of laboratory techniques have been used in studies that investigate the individual biological features, spanning from methods that screen the genome for chromosomal and genetic abnormalities, e.g. cytogenetics, CGH, SKY, cDNA micro array to detailed studies of specific aberrations, e.g. southern, northern and western blotting, PCR based analysis and immunohistochemistry. Dysregulation of genes involved in e.g. cell cycle control, proliferation, drug resistence, and metastasis have been linked to outcome of treatment and survival. The purpose of this review of the literature was to summarize what has been studied so far by cDNA micro array techniques with regards to genetic screening in general and biomarkers that relate to response to therapy and prediction of clinical outcome in particular. We conclude that the majority of investigations that focus on gene profiling have a descriptive character, e.g. comparisons of tumor and normal cells, metastatic and non-metastatic properties, and differences between sub-sites and grades of differentiation. There are just a handful studies that so far have investigated how gene profiling can be used to predict clinical course.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identification of genes associated with tumorigenesis and metastatic potential of hypopharyngeal cancer by microarray analysisOncogene, 2003
- Differential expression profiling of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)British Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behaviorPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implicationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- Chromosomal alterations in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck: Window to the biology of diseaseHead & Neck, 2001
- Potential molecular prognostic markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinomasHead & Neck, 2001
- Identification of differentially expressed genes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma by means of the Atlas human cancer cDNA expression arrayZeitschrift für Krebsforschung und Klinische Onkologie, 2000
- Identification of Genes Overexpressed in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using a Combination of Complementary DNA Subtraction and Microarray AnalysisThe Laryngoscope, 2000
- Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profilingNature, 2000
- Molecular Classification of Cancer: Class Discovery and Class Prediction by Gene Expression MonitoringScience, 1999