An Outbreak of Streptococcal Puerperal Sepsis
- 25 March 1965
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 272 (12) , 615-618
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm196503252721204
Abstract
HISTORICALLY, streptococcal puerperal sepsis has been one of the most frequent and devastating forms of hospital-acquired infections. Treatises on this subject appeared in the English literature as early as 1795,1 and some authorities, notably Holmes,2 were early believers in the contagiousness of the disease. Person-to-person transmission, however, was not clearly established until the classic studies of Semmelweis.3 Prevention and some degree of control of epidemics of puerperal sepsis was achieved by the introduction of antiseptic, aseptic and isolation technics,4 but the number of deaths from this cause still varied from 1.5 to 2.1 per 1000 births in England between 1925 . . .Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Gram-Negative BacteremiaArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1962
- INTRAPARTUM AND PUERPERAL INFECTIONClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1959
- OCCURRENCE OF SERIOUS BACTERIAL INFECTIONS SINCE INTRODUCTION OF ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTSJAMA, 1959
- Puerperal Infection**Presented at a meeting of the Chicago Gynecological Society, March 16, 1945.American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1946
- TREATMENT OF HUMAN PUERPERAL INFECTIONS, AND OF EXPERIMENTAL INFECTIONS IN MICE, WITH PRONTOSILThe Lancet, 1936
- THE SEROLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION OF PATHOGENIC AND NON-PATHOGENIC STRAINS OF HEMOLYTIC STREPTOCOCCI FROM PARTURIENT WOMENThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1935
- Epidemiologic and bacteriologic investigation of the Sloane Hospital epidemic of hemolytic streptococcus puerperal fever in 1927American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1928