What Explains Nurses’ Perceptions of Staffing Adequacy?
- 1 May 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration
- Vol. 32 (5) , 234-242
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005110-200205000-00003
Abstract
Much attention is being paid to the adequacy of nurse staffing in acute care hospitals, and much of the information relies on nurses' perceptions about staffing adequacy. Yet, we know little about what influences these perceptions. We examined the impact of hospital characteristics, nursing unit characteristics, nurse characteristics, and patient characteristics on nurses' perceptions of staffing adequacy. We tested three different models, incorporating different conceptualizations that relate current and past characteristics to these perceptions. This was a secondary analysis of data from the Outcomes Research in Nursing Administration Project, a longitudinal study conducted in 60 hospitals in the Southeastern United States. Perceptions of staffing adequacy were influenced significantly by the hospital's case mix index and growth in hospital admissions, by the number of beds on a unit, and by patient acuity. Further, current perceptions of staffing adequacy were significantly affected by prior perceptions. Based on our results, we present potential interventions for administrators that may ameliorate some of the negative influences on nurses' perceptions of staffing adequacy.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Managing the Informed Consent Process in Large Multicenter ProjectsNursing Research, 1999
- Gutting the Hospital: The Author RespondsHealth Affairs, 1996
- A Theoretical Model for Nursing Systems Outcomes ResearchNursing Administration Quarterly, 1996
- Environmental TurbulenceJONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 1995
- Maternal employment, family functioning, and preterm infant development at 9 and 12 monthsResearch in Nursing & Health, 1993
- Characteristics of Nursing Practice ModelsJONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 1992
- Extending the social information processing perspective: New links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990
- Random group effects and the precision of regression estimatesJournal of Econometrics, 1986
- Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980