INCIDENCE, ETIOLOGY, LOCATION, PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 160 (2) , 299-315
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62881-7
Abstract
During radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer tumor at the surgical margin is a relatively frequent finding. We summarize the literature on the incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. The literature was reviewed for data on positive margins during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Positive surgical margins may result from artifacts induced by tissue processing, incising inadvertently into the prostate or incising into extraprostatic tumor that has extended beyond the limits of resection. Patients with 10 ng./ml. or greater preoperative prostate specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score 7, multiple positive biopsies, or clinical stage T2b, T2c or T3 cancer have a higher risk of positive margins. Preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging may be useful in staging a select group of patients. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation reduces the incidence of positive margins but does not appear to delay progression or improve survival. The surgical approach, retropubic or perineal, may influence the location and etiology of positive margins. In general, nerve and bladder neck sparing procedures do not compromise tumor removal in appropriately selected patients. Positive margins increase the risk of progression and correlate with decreased cancer specific and overall survival. There is no consensus on the management of positive margins. External beam radiation and androgen deprivation may be administered as adjuvant therapy or at the time of recurrence. Tumor at the specimen edge is an adverse prognostic factor. With appropriate patient selection and meticulous surgical technique some positive margins can be prevented. Controlled prospective randomized studies of postoperative therapy are needed before definitive recommendations can be made for treating positive margins.Keywords
This publication has 126 references indexed in Scilit:
- Re: Endo-Rectal Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Is it Accurate?Journal of Urology, 1997
- Re: Endo-Rectal Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Is it Accurate?Journal of Urology, 1997
- Detection of Prostate Cancer Relapse With Prostate Specific Antigen Monitoring at Levels of 0.001 to 0.1 micro g./lJournal of Urology, 1997
- Wide Excision (Nonnerve Sparing) Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Using an Initial Perirectal DissectionJournal of Urology, 1997
- Do Close but Negative Margins in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Increase the Risk of Postoperative Progression?Journal of Urology, 1997
- Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study Comparing Radical Prostatectomy Alone and Neoadjuvant Androgen Withdrawal in the Treatment of Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1996
- Pathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Nonpalpable and Palpable Prostate Cancers with a Hybritech Prostate Specific Antigen of 4 to 10 ng./mlJournal of Urology, 1996
- Extended Followup of the Influence of Wide Excision of the Neurovascular Bundle(s) on Prognosis in Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer and Extensive Capsular PerforationJournal of Urology, 1996
- Endo-Rectal Coil Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: Is it Accurate?Journal of Urology, 1996
- Histological Characteristics of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Men with a Serum Prostate Specific Antigen of 4 ng./ml. or LessJournal of Urology, 1996