DETECTION OF HIDDEN FIGURES BY RHESUS MONKEYS
- 1 December 1966
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 23 (3) , 979-986
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1966.23.3.979
Abstract
Three rhesus monkeys [Macaca mulatta] discriminated between two forms and were then tested for identification of the forms when they were hidden by adding lines (Experiment 1). Ss [subjects were refested twice after discriminating between the forms with lines around them (Exp. 2) and, again, after discriminating between the forms with lines touching their sides (Exp. 3). Contrary to data from humans, embedded forms were not more difficult to identify than were masked forms. Ss consistently performed worse when lines touched the sides of the forms than they did when lines touched other portions of the forms. These findings suggest that over the three experiments, Ss were learning to attend to some feature of the sides of the forms rather than to their configurations.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alterations in pattern equivalence following inferotemporal and lateral striate lesions in rhesus monkeys.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966
- Perceptual Disembedding in Monkeys: Note on Method and Preliminary FindingsPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1965
- Effective stimuli for pattern discrimination in monkeysPsychonomic Science, 1965
- Stimulus correlates of visual pattern discrimination by monkeys: Area and contour.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1964
- Perception of Overlapping and Embedded Figures by Children of Different AgesThe American Journal of Psychology, 1956
- Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment?Psychological Review, 1955
- Über den Einfluß der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von FigurenPsychological Research, 1926