The New Centralization on Capitol Hill
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Review of Politics
- Vol. 50 (3) , 345-364
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500036299
Abstract
The consensus view of today's Congress — that its decentralized structure and dispersed power has pushed it to the edge of chaos — is badly in need of correcting. Despite the legacy of decentralization and fragmentation from the 1960's and 1970's reform era, the 1980's have seen a discernible trend toward leadership and order. Leading elements of this “new centralization” in congressional operations are described in this article. These include: contraction of the legislative workload; limitations in the numbers of participants at crucial junctures; resort to omnibus “mega-bills” to enact controversial policies; high levels of partisanship in voting; resurgence of leadership, especially in the House; and subtle shifts in power within the two chambers, primarily away from authorizing committees and toward fiscal committees. Taken together, these developments denote an institution markedly more cohesive and even hierarchical than portrayed in scholarly or journalistic accounts.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Consequences of Budget Reform for Congressional-Presidential RelationsThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1988
- One Bill, Many Committees: Multiple Referrals in the U. S. House of RepresentativesLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1988
- The Politics of BlameThe Brookings Review, 1987
- Congressional Committees as Moving TargetsLegislative Studies Quarterly, 1986
- Representation in Congress: The Case of the House Agriculture CommitteeAmerican Political Science Review, 1961