Are “treatment” bare metal stents superior to “control” bare metal stents? A meta-analytic approach
- 30 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 155 (4) , 624-629.e2
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.11.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Latin American randomized trial of balloon angioplasty versus coronary stenting in diabetic patients with small vessel reference size (Latin American Small Vessel [LASMAL II] Trial): Immediate and long-term resultsAmerican Heart Journal, 2005
- Meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting stents with bare metal stentsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2005
- A meta-analysis of clinical trials of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with obstructive coronary artery diseaseBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2005
- Frequency and time course of reocclusion and restenosis in coronary artery occlusions after balloon angioplasty versus wiktor stent implantation: results from the Mayo-Japan Investigation for Chronic Total Occlusion (MAJIC) TrialAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariateStatistics in Medicine, 2003
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- A randomized comparison of the value of additional stenting after optimal balloon angioplasty for long coronary lesionsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Stenting in small coronary arteries (SISCA) trial: A randomized comparison between balloon angioplasty and the heparin-coated beStentJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Balloon optimization versus stent study (BOSS): provisional stenting and early recoil after balloon angioplastyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2000
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986