Visual Analog Scales for Interpretation of Back and Leg Pain Intensity in Patients Operated for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disorders
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 26 (21) , 2375-2380
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200111010-00015
Abstract
A prospective observational study of visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain in patients operated at one institution within the framework of a national registry. To describe the use of recording VAS for pain intensity in patients operated on for lumbar spine problems. There is no consensus regarding pain outcomes assessment in spine patients. Pain intensity, recorded on a VAS, is one of the most used measures. Still, many aspects of its interpretation are still debated or unclear. A total of 755 consecutive patients, mean age 50 years (range, 15–86 years), operated from 1993 to 1998 were included in the study; there were 420 males and 335 females. Diagnoses included herniated nucleus pulposus (45%), central stenosis (19%), lateral stenosis (14%), isthmic spondylolisthesis (9%), and degenerative disc disease (9%). Local pain, radiating pain, analgesic intake, and walking ability were recorded before surgery and at 4 and 12 months after surgery. The patients’ opinions regarding the change in pain and satisfaction with the result were assessed separately. Correlation among variables reflecting perceived pain was sought. Preoperative VAS mean values for local and radiating pain were significantly different in the five diagnostic groups. Significant but moderate correlation between different types of pain outcomes and with patient satisfaction was present in all cases. Measuring pain intensity with VAS is a useful tool in describing spine patients. In the search for a standard in the evaluation of pain as an outcome, the differences between the various methods should be taken into account.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abstract A25: Public and provider awareness and use of a CA-125 test for ovarian cancerCancer Prevention Research, 2010
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- The effect of repeated epidural sympathetic nerve block on “failed back surgery syndrome” associated chronic low back painJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 1999
- Do first impressions count?European Spine Journal, 1998
- The Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Physician–assigned Visual Analog Pain ScoresAcademic Emergency Medicine, 1996
- The Dominant Role of Psychosocial Risk Factors in the Development of Chronic Low Back Pain DisabilitySpine, 1995
- A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in functionJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- Psychologic Classification of Low-Back Pain Patients: A Prognostic ToolSpine, 1986
- A methodological framework for assessing health indicesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985
- Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scalePain, 1983