Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study
Open Access
- 21 December 2006
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 7 (1) , 34
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-34
Abstract
Securing and managing finances for multicentre randomised controlled trials is a highly complex activity which is rarely considered in the research literature. This paper describes the process of financial negotiation and the impact of financial considerations in four UK multicentre trials. These trials had met, or were on schedule to meet, recruitment targets agreed with their public-sector funders. The trials were considered within a larger study examining factors which might be associated with trial recruitment (STEPS). In-depth semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in 2003–04 with 45 individuals with various responsibilities to one of the four trials. Interviewees were recruited through purposive and then snowball sampling. Interview transcripts were analysed with the assistance of the qualitative package Atlas-ti. The data suggest that the UK system of dividing funds into research, treatment and NHS support costs brought the trial teams into complicated negotiations with multiple funders. The divisions were somewhat malleable and the funding system was used differently in each trial. The fact that all funders had the potential to influence and shape the trials considered here was an important issue as the perspectives of applicants and funders could diverge. The extent and range of industry involvement in non-industry-led trials was striking. Three broad periods of financial work (foundation, maintenance, and resourcing completion) were identified. From development to completion of a trial, the trialists had to be resourceful and flexible, adapting to changing internal and external circumstances. In each period, trialists and collaborators could face changing costs and challenges. Each trial extended the recruitment period; three required funding extensions from MRC or HTA. This study highlights complex financial aspects of planning and conducting trials, especially where multiple funders are involved. Recognition of the importance of financial stability and of the need for appropriate training in this area should be paralleled by further similar research with a broader range of trials, aimed at understanding and facilitating the conduct of clinical research.Keywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Harmful impact of EU clinical trials directive:…and so has trial of melatonin in cancer related weight loss…BMJ, 2006
- Harmful impact of EU clinical trials directiveBMJ, 2006
- Why do General Practitioners prescribe antibiotics for acute infective conjunctivitis in children? Qualitative interviews with GPs and a questionnaire survey of parents and teachersFamily Practice, 2005
- Evidence Based Research in CBT with Adolescent Eating DisordersChild and Adolescent Mental Health, 2005
- Telephone interviewing in healthcare research: a summary of the evidenceNurse Researcher, 2005
- The Costs of Conducting Clinical ResearchJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Descriptive survey of non-commercial randomised controlled trials in the United Kingdom, 1980-2002BMJ, 2003
- Atitudes of patients and staff to research in a specialist palliative care unitPalliative Medicine, 2003
- Industry-sponsored clinical research: a double-edged swordThe Lancet, 2001
- Physicians’ Reasons for Not Entering Eligible Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgery for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984