Caffeine and nicotine improve visual tracking by rats: a comparison with amphetamine, cocaine and apomorphine
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychopharmacology
- Vol. 110 (1-2) , 169-176
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02246968
Abstract
Psychomotor stimulant drugs such as caffeine, nicotine, amphetamine and cocaine, have been shown to improve vigilance in man under conditions of fatigue. Nicotine has also been shown to improve performance in some cognitive tests in patients with Alzheimer's disease. In rodents these drugs increase activity which may confound “performance enhancing effects” in rodent models. However, improvements have been found in a number of tests that do not seem to be directly dependent upon an enhancement of locomotor activation. In one example, Evenden and Robbins (1985) reported consistent improvements in a visual tracking test following amphetamine. The present study was undertaken to determine whether these performance enhancing effects of amphetamine could also be obtained with cocaine and apomorphine, which both have psychomotor stimulant effects through their actions as, respectively, indirect and direct dopamine agonists, and by caffeine and nicotine, which do not have a direct dopaminergic mechanism of action. The results of the study indicate that all five drugs improved tracking performance at one or more doses. The most consistent effects were obtained with amphetamine which, like cocaine and nicotine, improved tracking at a dose which did not produce other changes in behaviour. Taking into account previous studies (Evenden and Robbins 1983, 1985), these results were interpreted as indicating that psychomotor stimulant drugs produce ageneral activation of behaviour. At all but the highest doses of such drugs, the form of behaviour that is observed depends upon the environment. The results of this study support the conclusion that in the situation where stimuli are present which exert a strong control over behaviour in the undrugged state, then the stimulated behaviour will be directed towards those, and may result in an enhancement of performance.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of Nicotine on Attention, Information Processing, and Short-Term Memory in Patients with Dementia of the Alzheimer TypeThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1989
- A comparison of the effects of amphetamine, apomorphine and white noise on response switching in the ratPsychopharmacology, 1989
- The effects of d-amphetamine, chlordiazepoxide and alpha-flupenthixol on food-reinforced tracking of a visual stimulus by ratsPsychopharmacology, 1985
- Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbensPsychopharmacology, 1984
- Smoking, nicotine and human performancePharmacology & Therapeutics, 1983
- Contrasting interactions of pipradrol, d-amphetamine, cocaine, cocaine analogues, apomorphine and other drugs with conditioned reinforcementPsychopharmacology, 1983
- Increased response switching, perseveration and perseverative switching following d-amphetamine in the ratPsychopharmacology, 1983
- Amphetamine-, scopolamine- and caffeine-induced locomotor activity following 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine systemPsychopharmacology, 1981
- Correlation of cholinergic abnormalities with senile plaques and mental test scores in senile dementia.BMJ, 1978
- Methamphetamine's effect on repeated acquisitions with serial discrimination reversalsPsychopharmacology, 1974