Statistical power of MRI monitored trials in multiple sclerosis: new data and comparison with previous results
Open Access
- 1 April 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 66 (4) , 465-469
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.66.4.465
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the durations of the follow up and the reference population sizes needed to achieve optimal and stable statistical powers for two period cross over and parallel group design clinical trials in multiple sclerosis, when using the numbers of new enhancing lesions and the numbers of active scans as end point variables. METHODS The statistical power was calculated by means of computer simulations performed using MRI data obtained from 65 untreated relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive patients who were scanned monthly for 9 months. The statistical power was calculated for follow up durations of 2, 3, 6, and 9 months and for sample sizes of 40–100 patients for parallel group and of 20–80 patients for two period cross over design studies. The stability of the estimated powers was evaluated by applying the same procedure on random subsets of the original data. RESULTS When using the number of new enhancing lesions as the end point, the statistical power increased for all the simulated treatment effects with the duration of the follow up until 3 months for the parallel group design and until 6 months for the two period cross over design. Using the number of active scans as the end point, the statistical power steadily increased until 6 months for the parallel group design and until 9 months for the two period cross over design. The power estimates in the present sample and the comparisons of these results with those obtained by previous studies with smaller patient cohorts suggest that statistical power is significantly overestimated when the size of the reference data set decreases for parallel group design studies or the duration of the follow up decreases for two period cross over studies. CONCLUSIONS These results should be used to determine the duration of the follow up and the sample size needed when planning MRI monitored clinical trials in multiple sclerosis.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Guidelines for using quantitative measures of brain magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 1998
- Exploratory treatment trials in multiple sclerosis using MRI: sample size calculations for relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive subgroups using placebo controlled parallel groupsJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1998
- Specific power calculations for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in monitoring active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS): implications for phase II therapeutic trialsMultiple Sclerosis Journal, 1997
- Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1996
- Guidelines for the use of magnetic resonance techniques in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 1996
- Magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis patients: Statistical power of parallel-groups and crossover designsJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 1994
- Gadolinium enhancement increases the sensitivity of MRI in detecting disease activity in multiple sclerosisBrain, 1993
- Using gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging lesions to monitor disease activity in multiple sclerosisAnnals of Neurology, 1992
- Magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis: concerted action guidelines.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1991
- New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocolsAnnals of Neurology, 1983