Summative Assessment in Higher Education: Practices in disarray
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Higher Education
- Vol. 27 (3) , 275-286
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070220000662
Abstract
The article begins with a view of learning and of what its assessment entails, arguing that it is helpful to distinguish between assessment systems primarily intended to provide feedout and those intended to provide feedback. Attention is then concentrated on summative, feedout, or high stakes assessment, which is supposed to be highly reliable. A number of difficulties with current practices are then identified, leading to the claim that high stakes assessment in first degrees is in such disarray that it is difficult to know what grades or classifications mean and risky to treat them as reliable. Two main lines of response are explored. The first treats this as a failure of technique, while the second adds that assessment purposes themselves have fallen into disarray, which requires a reappraisal of curriculum in addition to any technical changes that appear to be expedient.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reconsidering Graduate Employability: The 'graduate identity' approachQuality in Higher Education, 2001
- Research and the Development of Educational AssessmentOxford Review of Education, 2000
- Are assessors professional?Active Learning in Higher Education, 2000
- Perspectives on Learning, Thinking, and ActivityEducational Researcher, 2000
- Non‐formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional workBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 2000
- Contextualising Authentic AssessmentAssessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1999
- Generic Descriptors: a health checkQuality in Higher Education, 1999
- Using Marks to Assess Student Performance, some problems and alternativesAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1998
- Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychologyBritish Journal of Psychology, 1997
- Work-load and the quality of student learningStudies in Higher Education, 1992