The Effect of a Urethral Catheter on the Measurement of Maximum Urinary Flow Rate
- 1 August 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 128 (2) , 429-432
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)52953-5
Abstract
The maximum urinary flow rates of 147 male [human] subjects referred for voiding difficulties were measured in the presence and absence of a fine urethral catheter. A comparison of these flow rates showed that those measured with the catheter in situ were lower than would be anticipated for the same voided volumes in the absence of a catheter. Although the reduction in flow rate caused by the catheter was only several ml/s, it was sufficient to alter the diagnostic categorization of almost a 3rd of the subjects classified as obstructed, unobstructed or equivocal on the basis of a plot of detrusor voiding pressure vs. maximum flow rate. The effect of the urethral catheter on diagnostic classification was most pronounced in the borderline patients on whom urodynamics would usually be performed to clarify the clinical assessment. Apparently, the routine performance of full urodynamic studies for the assessment of outflow obstruction is unwarranted.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Normal Peak Urinary Flow Rates Obtained from Small Voided Volumes can Provide a Reliable Assessment of Bladder FunctionJournal of Urology, 1982
- An Office Method for Calibrating a UroflowmeterJournal of Urology, 1982
- The Assessment of Prostatic Obstruction from Urodynamic Measurements and from Residual UrineBritish Journal of Urology, 1979
- Third Report on the Standardisation of Terminology of Lower Urinary Tract FunctionScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1978
- URETHRAL RESISTANCE TO MICTURITION: British Association of Urological Surgeons Prize EssayBritish Journal of Urology, 1968
- A Challenge to Current Urodynamic ThoughtJournal of Urology, 1967