The FDA, Politics, and Plan B
- 3 June 2004
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 350 (23) , 2413-2414
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200406033502316
Abstract
In response to the editorial by Drazen and colleagues (April 8 issue)1: It is a terrible message that the findings of scientists can be subject to the pressure of politicians, especially when the goal is the same — to prevent undesired pregnancies and to minimize the need for abortion. Levonorgestrel emergency contraception (Plan B) is amazingly free of severe adverse effects and is very effective. Condoms are openly displayed and sold over the counter in many large pharmacies. There is no reason why Plan B should not be treated similarly. The message should be that if one engages in sexual activities, they should be consensual and safe and engaged in with forethought. In case that fails, prevention of pregnancy should be available in a timely fashion. Over-the-counter status would be medically smart and socially responsible.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- The FDA, Politics, and Plan BNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Estimating the effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pillsContraception, 2003
- Postfertilization Effect of Hormonal Emergency ContraceptionAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 2002